Free Novel Read

Creative Nonfiction Page 3

where the voice doesn't get in the way," explains Lisa Bain, senior

  editor at Glamour who learned her trade at Esquire. "Which is one

  thing with a lot of heavy stylists-you get caught up in the language,

  rather than having the language forward the story." Editors have a

  phrase for wonderful writing, she explains: They say it sings. "Good

  writing has a lyricism and a rhythm to it," she says. "It's very hard to

  put into words."

  Look closely at this brief passage from Lopez' Arctic Dreams:

  "Winter darkness shuts off the far view. The cold drives you deep

  into your clothing, muscles you back into your home. Even the mind

  retreats into itself."

  Listen to it. Hear the writing sing?

  Or this sentence from White Town Drowsing, Powers' book about

  Hannibal, Missouri, a hometown he shared with Mark Twain: "I grew.

  up in a town that seemed less a town to me than a kingdom."

  The simple, unadorned writing opens an elegant metaphor.

  11

  Creative Nonfiction

  THE ART LIES IN THE CRAFT

  A good way to approach writing creative nonfiction, paradoxically, is

  to forget about the creative-the literary-part and concentrate on the

  nonfiction part. Pay enough attention to the craft of learning the story

  and telling it clearly, accurately and economically, and the art will

  happen when you're not looking.

  Writing nonfiction is simple: You find out some facts, you figure

  out how to arrange them in light of a larger idea, then you do something artful with the arrangement. Simple, but hard. Like climbing a mountain-all you have to do is keep going up. The most important

  step is always the next one. That's the craft of it-paying attention to

  what's under your feet, what your hands are grabbing hold of, working

  against the gravity of all your bad habits.

  "I consider myself a storyteller," says Reiss, author of seven novels

  and two books of nonfiction and a correspondent for Outside magazine. "And I distinguish between stories I make up and stories I find out." Creative nonfiction is the stories you find out, captured with a

  clear eye and an alert imagination, filtered through a mind passionate

  to know and tell, told accurately and with compelling grace.

  12

  CHAPTER TWO

  FINDING AN

  ORIGINAL SUBJECT

  Tthreats a woman can know: breast cancer. Two biopsies, a

  erry Tempest

  small tumor Williams

  between

  was

  the

  facing

  ribs,

  one of

  borderline the most chilling

  malignancy. Would

  she inherit the legacy of her female relatives? Her mother had fought

  the same disease and won, but only for a while. Both grandmothers

  and six aunts, like her mother, had all undergone mastectomies. The

  future looked dangerous.

  Because she is a writer, and writing is how writers make sense of

  the world-especially the scary parts-she chose to write about it: "A

  person who is told she has cancer faces a hideous recognition that

  something monstrous is happening within her own body," she writes

  in Refuge.

  The subject captured her attention, preoccupied her, focused her.

  "Perhaps I am telling this story in an attempt to heal myself," she

  writes in the prologue, "to confront what I do not know, to create a

  path for myself with the idea that 'memory is the only way home.' "

  But had she written only about her personal struggle, or even her

  mother's struggle, while it might have been compelling in the way

  that TV-movie scenarios are compelling but ultimately forgettable, she

  would have written a one-note symphony-just a sad story we already

  knew by heart.

  But she did something most writers would never think to do, something profound. She looked beyond her own predicament and found a larger parallel in the impending ruin of a migratory bird refuge

  13

  Creative Nonfiction

  threatened by the rising waters of Great Salt Lake. She set her own

  struggle-and that of her mother-in the context of a larger world of

  community, nesting birds, Mormon tradition, the desert West, theology and humane values. She chose beauty and meaning over personal melodrama.

  Refuge takes the reader beyond easy sympathy to understandingof a much larger chain of events, including nuclear testing, environmental caretaking, family duty, religious faith and personal responsibility. She gives the reader choices and so makes the reader participate in her choices. Her book is painfully accurate, poignantly

  sorrowful, yet also full of warmth, gentleness and hope. It is the work

  of a clear mind and a large imagination-not of self-pity or victimization or blame.

  It is also a book of facts and figures-it even contains an appendix

  listing the birds who find refuge in the Bear River preserve. And

  Williams does the human arithmetic precisely, in a voice we can

  trust-the statistical balance of breeding species, the ratio of habitat

  to survival, the equation between nuclear testing in the 1950s and

  cancer rates in the 1980s.

  Since we're talking about literary nonfiction and not plain journalism, it might seem that subject matter is irrelevant. The literary writer is, we agree, a stylist-a maker of literary art. So there's no

  need to do research, to pay attention to the mundane details of real

  life, to take notes, visit archives, go on field trips, interview interesting

  people. It all comes from the Muse, right? You reach inside where

  your art lives, and you tell the truth, right? You are inspired, and, being

  inspired, you write beautifully, the lovely words tripping off your pen?

  Well, not exactly.

  William Matthews' poem "A Night at the Opera" shows us two

  aging performers struggling mightily to pull off their operatic roles.

  Using makeup to hide their flaws, faking what their talent isn't quite

  fine enough to do naturally, enduring shopworn and gamy costumes,

  they manage, barely, to float their romantic illusion before the audience. It's a kind of magic show, really-a triumph of appearance over reality, of what seems over what is. During the poem, we pity themwe want brilliance, virtuosity, genius, not these journeymen actors.

  We even resent them for pretending so hard, for resorting to stagy

  tricks, for being such stubborn, veteran troupers.

  14

  Finding an Original Subject

  Until the devastating last line: "Beauty's for amateurs." We realize,

  all at once, that they've been making art the only way art can be

  fashioned, through labor and craft, out of the imperfect things of this

  world.

  WANTED: AN ACCURATE SENSE OF THE WORLD

  There's no denying that some reflective writers write mostly about

  themselves, tracking their thoughts, exploring the whimsical workings of their own imaginations: Vladimir Nabokov. Nancy Mairs. Peter Matthiessen. Gore Vidal.

  But notice also how their best work always depends on an absolutely accurate sense of the real world-not in some vague, generic way, but in all its astonishing particulars. They know the names of

  plants and animals-in Williams' book, each chapter is named for a

  migrating bird: western tanager, long-billed curlew, Wilson's phalarope. She presents each of them with a naturalist's living detail.

  Such writers pay attention to wha
t goes on around them and are

  curious about nearly everything. They have read not just American

  history but also Russian history. They can find Trinidad-Tobago on

  a globe. They're intrigued by Caribbean weather, suburban traffic

  patterns, how farm machinery works. Reiss speaks for all such writers

  when he says, "One of the great things about being human, one of the

  joys of being alive, is the understanding of things that are complex."

  They listen to how new lovers talk, watch how they move their

  hands during an argument across the room. They touch the coarse

  fabric of an old army uniform jacket-and the broken knees of an old

  friend who once played football. They roll down their windows and

  stop the car so they can smell the night breeze outside of Deming,

  New Mexico. And even at that moment, when they are completely

  captivated by the moment, they are also outside themselves, inventing

  the words they would use to describe the aroma of dust, hot asphalt

  and sage. They can't help it. They are in the habit of noticing things

  through words.

  When they go on vacation, they go off the tour. It isn't that they

  are not astonished by cathedrals, but they are more fascinated by the

  old women in black shawls drinking aperitifs at the tobacco shop next

  door at nine o'clock in the morning-in the looming shadow of a

  sacred Gothic architecture of light.

  15

  Creative Nonfiction

  They find local monuments to suffering that aren't in the guidebooks-in this forest clearing in Brittany, three local partisans were executed by a Nazi firing squad. At an Anasazi cliffhouse ruin, they

  are overwhelmed by the ghosts, real as tourists, going about their

  business across the centuries. At parties, they always wind up in the

  kitchen among people they've just met, very late, sitting on the counter

  drinking too much wine, not talking but listening.

  When they go for a walk in a new city, their eyes gaze up past the

  first story to the signature architecture above street level, where the

  gargoyles live. They deliberately do things they've never done, go

  places they haven't been, even-especially-to places in their own

  backyards. They climb up into their neighbor's attic and watch their

  own house from a completely new perspective-briefly, irrationally

  thrilled, expecting some stranger to emerge from their own front door.

  They make it a point to be where interesting things are liable to

  happen. And because they prowl the world with their eyes wide open

  and their ears pricked for sound, wherever they go interesting things

  are liable to happen.

  REFINING THE SUBJECT

  For example, in the closing chapter of Annie Dillard's autobiographical gem, The Writing Li/e, Dillard describes the life and death of aerobatic pilot Dave Rahm. It's a thoroughly researched and precisely

  reported section. And, like all good literature, it's also about something else: making art. Dillard spins a lyrical analogy between the airborne line of the stunt pilot through an imaginary box of blue skycurving, dipping, rolling, falling and recovering-and the transcendent exhilaration that is the reason for art. And the dangerous life of the artist.

  Then in a stroke, she closes the analogic distance and makes them

  one and the same: "When Rahm flew, he sat down in the middle of

  art and strapped himself in."

  So creative nonfiction seems to need a subject at least as much as

  a newspaper story-more-because the subject has to carry itself and

  also be an elegant vehicle for larger meanings.

  But Dillard reminds us that she didn't start with a fully realized

  idea for an essay that connected aerobatic flying with making art. She

  started out by going to an airshow in Bellingham, Washington, where

  16

  Finding an Original Subject

  she had recently moved, with, as she writes, "the newcomer's willingness to try anything once." In other words, having arrived at a new home, she was casting about her for interesting ways to pass the time.

  She was not herself a pilot or even an airplane buff. She did not go to

  the airshow for the specific purpose of writing about it, then or ever.

  The airshow just seemed more interesting than an afternoon at home.

  Who knows-something might tum up.

  What turned up-who turned up-was a living wonder. A pilot of

  amazing skill and daring named Dave Rahm. Like the others in the

  crowd that afternoon, Dillard oohed and ahhed in amazement. But

  then she did the next thing: She pondered what she had just witnessed

  and decided it was important enough to learn more about. She worked

  on it with her mind and imagination. She read articles, asked questions, even went flying with him, so she could feel his art happening in her stomach, in the pull of g-forces against her viscera, experience

  the vertigo, the liberating terror of tumbling through space under

  control, just barely. She began to understand what Dave Rahm was

  all about. The larger implications became clear.

  This is important: Good subjects aren't just lying around waiting to

  be scooped up. The writer has to take raw data and somehow refine

  it toward meaning. Sometimes the interest is obvious, in a general

  way; other times it is not obvious to anyone, even the writer.

  In this case, hundreds, thousands of people had witnessed Rahm's

  performance over the years without ever turning it into literature.

  Finding in aerobatics a worthy subject-beyond the pedestrian interest of the feature story, an ooh-and-ahh in print-took imaginative effort. Time and hard work. Reflection and phone calls. A willingness

  to invest herself, to take chances, to be scared. In this case, Dillard

  literally risked her life to discover her subject. Such aerobatic flying

  is very risky, as Rahm was the first to admit. Pilots routinely crashed.

  Every stunt pilot eventually crashed, including Dave Rahm-those

  were the odds.

  Dave Rahm wasn't a subject until Dillard dared to tum him into a

  subject.

  FIND THE HUMAN STORY

  And there's a corollary lesson: One way or another, the focus of

  every really good story is a person. In a magazine, the human story

  17

  Creative Nonfiction

  often takes the form of a profile. The writer is intrigued by a particular

  individual-usually a celebrity, some newsworthy figure, or else some

  unsung hero of science, politics or art. The profile is a kind of portrait.

  It depends on intimate detail of a living personality-and, if the writer

  is not scrupulous, it can quickly devolve into sentimental hero worship

  or a gossipy ambush. It's easy to hold up a paragon of genius, virtue

  or worldly success, just as it is easy to bash anybody who has a high

  profile. Much harder is to present a portrait of a life in action that

  communicates the complexity, the contradictions, of a particular

  human personality.

  Gore Vidal is one of the few masters of such portraits-he has

  given us such diverse figures as John F. Kennedy, Anthony Burgess,

  Eleanor Roosevelt, Ronald and Nancy Reagan, and Orson Welles. His

  profiles usually come in between the lines of his purported subjecta review of a new book, an analysis of a political campaign, an essay on popular culture. His portraits have provocative, unexpected titles:

>   "Theodore Roosevelt: An American Sissy."

  Vidal deftly blends objective detail with his own interpretive

  powers, and admits his biases both implicitly and explicitly. In "Barry

  Goldwater: a Chat," he first tells us that Goldwater's office is in the

  old Senate Office Building. "The corridors are marble with high ceilings and enormous doors which tend to dwarf not only visitors but Senators," he writes. So far, so objective. Then: "There is an air of

  quiet megalomania which is beguiling in its nakedness." And we

  haven't even met Goldwater yet.

  When we walk into Goldwater's office with Vidal, we see that "The

  large desk was catercornered so that the light from the windows was

  in the visitor's face." We know at once who is in charge. By the time

  we are told that Goldwater keeps a small bookcase beside his desk,

  we already have guessed what it contains: a leather-bound set of the

  speeches of Barry Goldwater.

  The biographer takes the human subject even further, trying to

  re-create a whole life and the mystery behind the accomplishment of

  that life, the reason the individual is worthy of a biography in the first

  place. As David Nasaw, biographer of William Randolph Hearst, puts

  it, "What the biographer does is try to figure out the riddle of creativity: how did it get there? Why did it get there? What the biographer tries to do is unravel the alchemist's mystery, to find out how, 18

  Finding an Original Subject

  out of these mundane lives, great things are created-out of nothing,

  something appears."

  FIND YOUR PASSION

  Any story is a very complex transaction between writer and reader. It's

  useful for the writer to answer three questions about this transaction:

  1. Who is writing this?

  2. Why am I telling this story?

  3. Who will be reading this?

  The answer to the first question seems obvious to the writer: I am

  writing this. But it's a trick question, a two-parter. One part is, Who

  am I? in life. The second part is, Who am I to be telling this particular

  story?

  Bob Reiss recounts the story of his first meeting with Walter

  Anderson, editor of Parade magazine. He managed to get an appointment with Anderson, even though he was just starting out as a freelancer, having left the Chicago Tribune. He had a list of eight ideasstory proposals-that he thought were original and interesting. As he ticked off his eight brilliant ideas, Anderson dismissed each one in